Barr Supports Chokehold Ban Except When Police Met With Lethal Force

Attorney General William Barr said Monday that he supports a prohibition on the use of chokeholds by police unless officers are confronted with “potentially lethal force.”
In a wide-ranging interview on Fox Newss “Special Report” with Bret Baier, the attorney general covered ground that included the movement to defund law enforcement and addressed what he called a “crisis in policing.”
Barr, at one point, was asked about his views on one aspect of police reform being called for, namely a ban on certain restraint techniques on grounds that they are inherently dangerous.
“I think we should ban chokeholds, lateral chokeholds … unless police officers are confronted with potentially lethal force,” Barr replied.
State and city governments in parts of the country have moved to impose chokehold bans.
Minneapolis city council voted last week to ban chokeholds and neck restraints like the one used against George Floyd, who died after an officer applied his knee to Floyds head and neck area for nearly 9 minutes.

The incident, which Barr called “ghastly,” sparked mass protests and led to mounting calls to overhaul police procedures, including to limit legal protections for police, create a national database of excessive-force encounters, and ban police chokeholds.
A rallying cry of some protesters and proponents of police reform is to “defund the police,” a many-hued movement that ranges from relatively moderate calls to adjust police budgets to fund the establishment of complementary community-based solutions, to extreme proposals to disband police departments entirely.
Activist group MPD150 says on its website that it is “working toward a police-free Minneapolis” gradually, describing the concept as being about “strategically reallocating resources, funding, and responsibility away from police and toward community-based models of safety, support, and prevention.”
Rep. Karen Bass (D-Calif.), chairwoman of the Congressional Black Caucus, said part of the movement is really about how money is spent.
“Now, I dont believe that you should disband police departments,” she said in an interview with CNN. “But I do think that, in cities, in states, we need to look at how we are spending the resources and invest more in our communities.”
“Maybe this is an opportunity to re-envision public safety,” she added.
Defunding Police
Barr said in the interview he stands in opposition to efforts to disband police departments.
“I think its the exact opposite of the way we should go,” Barr said. “I understand given the history of racial injustice in this country why the African American community, or at least some of it, would view the ghastly events in Minneapolis as manifestations of institutional racism in police departments.”
“But I think in the past 50 or 60 years, weve had a lot of reform of police departments,” Barr said, adding that compared to his previous tenure as attorney general some 30 years ago, “I can tell you theres a world of difference.”
He said theres now a greater understanding of what drove the need for change both among police leadership and rank-and-file members on the force, “and there has been great change,” Barr insisted.
“Defunding police, holding the entire police structure responsible for the actions of certain officers is wrong,” Barr said, adding, “and I think its dRead More From Source